Apple's stock options nightmare continues

|
Share

 Apple's stock options accounting nightmare just never seems to go away, with papers filed last week in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara claiming new evidence proving management were "aware of and participated in the backdating scheme".

The case, number 1-08-CV-110403, was filed by the Boston Retirement Board, claiming new evidence to have been unearthed as a result of an investigation of Apple's own confidential records. Boston Retirement Board says it cannot describe this evidence at this stage of the court filing because the court has not ruled yet on how the confidential information should be treated. 

It says the evidence may have to be submitted in a sealed form to the court, arguing that the case should be heard (even though the window in which such a case could be filed has passed) because of the time it took to secure the necessary clearance to examine Apple's confidential papers. 

Papers have been filed against Jobs and former/current Apple directors/officers: William Campbell, Millard Drexler, Arthur Levinson, Jerome York, Gareth Chang, Edgar Wollard, Fred Anderson and Nancy Heinen. 

The Boston Retirement Board is attempting to prove Apple wasted more than $105 million on the extra value of backdated stock options granted to CEO Steve Jobs, reports FindLaw.com. It alleges Jobs and the directors knew options were not dated correctly. We're just hoping the fallout from Apple's admitted mistake fades away.

 

Comments (2)

I just hope Apple does not become the next Microsoft and think it can do whatever it wants. Microsoft started monopolizing everything it could get its hands on in the 1990s, which got them in very big trouble. If Apple starts to think that they are god, then it could bode very bad consequences. I hope they don't get slammed by the Department of Defense also in conjunction with the PA SEMI venture. I know Apple is doing well, but they need to know that they are not above everyone else, here.

Just another attempt by Apple haters to accomplish in the courts what they and their supporters can`t do in the marketplace.