Apple needs to give its iPhone, iPod Touch OSX platform a singular name. What should it be called?

Tue, 12/11/2007 - 2:54am — admin
iPhod
2% (88 votes)
Touch OSX
22% (920 votes)
OSX lite
13% (525 votes)
I've put or see a better idea in the comments
3% (127 votes)
None of the above. Keep calling the iPhone-iPod Touch OSX lite touch platform.
8% (334 votes)
Pod OSX - (added at 400 votes)
3% (110 votes)
OS X mobile (added at 400 votes)
43% (1782 votes)
OSXi (added at 400 votes)
6% (265 votes)
Total votes: 4151

Comments

It's already called 'OS X'

3736

It's already called 'OS X' as compared to 'Mac OS X' for the Mac. As it's essentially the same codebase, that's what it should be called too...

OS X for iPhone or OS X

2731

OS X for iPhone or OS X Portable or Mobile OS X

Call it "OS X mobile",

3529

Call it "OS X mobile", that's pretty much what it is. Right? ...

OSeXy

3432

OSeXy

Cool name! Like it a lot.

3631

Cool name! Like it a lot.

The right name is: Pod OS X

3038

The right name is:
Pod OS X

+1 Pod OS X

3337

+1
Pod OS X

iOS.

4342

iOS.

just 'touch'

3634

just 'touch'

I voted for Touch OSX, but

3738

I voted for Touch OSX, but really it should be called OS X Touch.

It does what it says on the tin.

It's OS X + Touchscreen capabilities.

Simple really.

 

M.

agreed on OSX touch

3030

agreed on OSX touch

Diet OSX

6534

Diet OSX

iWorld

2842

iWorld

eWorld was such a success,

3533

eWorld was such a success, why not?!

"Just OS X" would be my

3341

"Just OS X" would be my option

Mo-X  

3131

Mo-X

 

I find myself continuosly

3836

I find myself continuosly referring to my iPod Touch as "iTouch". I think that pretty much sums it up.

Touch X

4031

Touch X

Almost...Any apparatus based

4131

Almost...Any apparatus based on OS X and Touch technology should be referred to as "XTouch" cf. XServe the server technology based on OS X.

AppleM (m) Think about

3032

AppleM (m)

Think about it, IF they were to buy into 700MHz you would need a cross-platform lite OS which would work with TV, iPod Touch, iPhone, iPod and future devices. OSX is really, OS 10 and there are only 5 iterations left.

IF all of this were coming about as OSX was being introduced as 10.1, then I would definitely jump on the OSXm(obile) bandwagon.

Leopard Cub  

3434

Leopard Cub

 

Why would an iPhone/iPod

3028

Why would an iPhone/iPod touch-integrated OS X that isn't sold separately need a special name? It's Mac OS X, just like the Apple TV-optimized version is.

Calling it OSX Mobile is a

3429

Calling it OSX Mobile is a cop-out. Its mobility is not its shining point of differentiation. It's the touch interface. "Touch OSX" separates logically and linguistically from "Mac OSX". "Touch OSX" is also a command, an invitation to experience the difference. Clearly the best choice.

Calling it OSX Mobile is a

3035

Calling it OSX Mobile is a cop-out. Its mobility is not its shining point of differentiation. It's the touch interface. "Touch OSX" separates logically and linguistically from "Mac OSX". "Touch OSX" is also a command, an invitation to experience the difference. Clearly the best choice.

That's exactly why it will still be called "OSX" as touch will be integrated back into the mainline. Right now touch is the differentiator, but don't expect that to last.

Apple OS

3136

Apple OS

why not just call it Leopard

3632

why not just call it Leopard for Devices yet have everyone just call it leopard?

How about X-Men, no no,

2830

How about X-Men, no no, that's taken. How about TouchU!? No, okay. How about GenXer? Nope. How about Ten2Go? How about OSwee? (wee - as in little) - a take from Nintendo Wii... How about nliteten? (take from the word enlighten). How about TabbyPower? (take on Apple's OS Big Cat names like Tiger, Leopard etc to a smaller verson cat like Tabby)

OS X Ultimate Mobile 4 Biz,

4637

OS X Ultimate Mobile 4 Biz, that's the ticket!

Apple needs to differentiate their OS just like MicroSoft. Apple needs to create branches of it's OS so it can justify future hires to fill that new building they're constructing in Cupertino. As MS has shown, confusing the customers with multiple OSs is the way to huge profits.

How 'bout • MobiOS X

3029

How 'bout

• MobiOS X (pronounced "mobius," from mobile OS X)

• TranspOS X (pronounced "transpose x" from transportable OS X)

• Xport (portable X)

Call it simply MOBILE X

3430

Call it simply MOBILE X