
OK, we know we can't get over it. Yes, the numbers from Net Applications. It is truly amazing (and hard to comprehend!) that in 5 short months, the iPhone not only matched, but opened up a huge lead on Microsoft, Symbian and Palm COMBINED. These are platforms that have been around for up to a decade...when the net was first catching on in the mobile space.
Then Apple releases their little device and it's all over. The Wall Street Journal hypothesizes why:
Companies have been making mobile devices that run Windows since 1996, according to Computer World [ed - it is Computerworld!!! - everything has gone to pot since Rupert moved in], and three million of the devices were shipped in the first quarter of 2007 alone, according to research company Gartner. Here’s some more perspective: There are approximately 1.25 billion Internet users worldwide. IPhone owners are the first people with a mobile phone to view Web pages at the same rate at people using a PC.
It’s obvious that people have a need for Web access even when they aren’t at their desks or at home or wherever else they have a PC. We think that businesses could make their employees more productive by making sure that the mobile devices they give them have a full-fledged browser. We’re not saying companies should go out and buy everyone an iPhone – although if you do we’d love to hear about it. But presumably, it’s just a matter of time until an iPhone-like browser is a standard feature on mobile devices.
Yes, it is the browser. It is like a PC. IF you don't own one, you don't understand. Mobile Safari has changed everything. Good thing we called it back in May.
Comments
Ok, you can stop falling all
Ok, you can stop falling all over yourselves looking at these numbers; Because they can not possibly be correct. Forget Windows, Palm and iPhone. The numbers they reported for Series 60 phones was .1%!!! That alone should tell you these stats are garbage.
Series 60 is all over Europe and Asia and they make up the majority of mobiles. They OWN the mobile browser segment. Double check those numbers and call me when you come to your senses.
Full disclosure: I use an
Full disclosure:
I use an HTC Kaiser, iPod Touch and Nokia 770. So you can stop any fanboi replies.
-C
C, I know 5 guys at work
C,
I know 5 guys at work with a Series 60, not one of them use the web browser on their phone.
I used to have a Dell x50v pda, which even has a higher res and larger screen than the iPhone. but using mobile IE on it was just garabe. I could bluetooth to my mobile and connect the pda to the web on the go but mustly it just wasn't worth doing because of IE.
Having an installed base doesn't mean OWNing the mobile browser USAGE market as you seem to think and as these stats seem to say.
Now i have pda, phone and ipod in one device....and you seem to be proud to have 3 devices....ditch em and get an iphone and be happy.
I have a Nokia E61, which I
I have a Nokia E61, which I have had for over a year now. The web browser is crap. Not exactly because the web browser itself is crap, but because the OS it is based on isn't well-threaded (images and CSS seem to be downloaded one-after-another in sequence), and has abysmal memory management (literally - allocated memory falls into an abyss whenever any kind of exception occurs). I can browse maybe 10 web pages, which even over WiFi take about 20 seconds each to load, and then the program has leaked so much memory that the phone needs to be restarted. This is even with the newest firmware.
The browser may be the same, but in this case it's 80% about the OS, and 20% about superior scaling and resolution management. I have -- literally -- browsed more web-pages on an iPhone I used for three days, than I have browsed on my Symbian device in a year.
@anon coward "garabe" might
@anon coward "garabe" might be this month's best inadvertent internet neologism! It is all a bunch of "garabe" to me. Or "Ma, I forgot to take out the 'garabe'".
I used to use Opera on my
I used to use Opera on my Symbian 60 phone, and use IE on my Windows Mobile phone; but I know way more people who have those facilities and don't use them, simply because the user experience sucks.
That said, if anyone had a problem with those stats, they could rather have questioned how the iPhone beat Win 95 and Win 98 in usage terms -- I would've thought that those two OS would still have a comparatively large base.
Of course, the likelihood is that EVERY iPhone user, and half or more iPod Touch users browse the web with Safari, so it's not all that inconceivable for Safari to be where it is now, or to be #3 by the end of '08 as you predicted in the original article.
it'S all over! Mind the
it'S all over! Mind the spelling!