1.1.3 Hack goes official

|
Share

Update: Mac version released

It's really not much of news anymore since it usually happens within  a few weeks of a iPhone software update,  but iPhone software 1.1.3 is hacked.  Word on the street is that this version has some interesting updates.  Applications run as user "Mobile" instead of "root" and Preferences are no longer stored in var/root.  Obviosly the sign of a maturing operating system.

The current hack as of right now is only on an upgrade from 1.1.1 or 1.1.2 and only on Windows computers but usually these things get sorted out in short order.  Again, excellent work by the dev team - splinter group this time.

From TUAW:

A splinter dev team has just released its 1.1.3 jailbreak. This jailbreak, as discussed in our earlier post provides a "soft upgrade" path for jailbroken 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 users. (See that post for many of the technical details.) For right now, this jailbreak is limited to Windows users only, with a Mac release expected shortly. This does not jailbreak the iPod touch--iPhone only for now.

A special edition of Nate True's iBrickr software will prepare the image used for the update and a second installer portion will flash the phone. Smxy repository maintainer, Shaun Erickson has packed up this second portion of the jailbreak, which will be available via Installer.app.

iPhone hacker NerveGas raised concerns as to whether this release would illegally distribute Apple software. Nate assures me that he merely uses a diff (differences) file between the 1.1.3 firmware as provided and the jailbroken 1.1.3 firmware. NerveGas asked me to mention that this release is not canon and distributed against his wishes and against the wishes of some of the dev/elite team. From what I understand, the dev team was behind this release until shortly before Nate took it live. NerveGas's copyright concerns divided the team, splitting opinions on whether it should go live just at the wire.

Huge kudos for this jailbreak go primarily to the awesome iPhone hackers "planetbeing" and _Fred, who were the first to jailbreak. Other amazing developers include Zibri, netkas, NerveGas, asap18, bgm, Bugout, bushing, chris_, dinopio, drudge, gray, MuscleNerd, natetrue, pr3d4t0r, roxfan, Turbo, Zf[strike], np101137, pumpkin, and kroo, along with many contributors who wish to remain anonymous.

 

Comments (8)

ethical hackers. Now that's news!

no it's not.  Computer hackers are by and large very ethical people.  To portray them otherwise is just plain stupid

I breaking the terms of use agreement is not illegal as well? If you think not then there must be a very wide line you walk between legal and illegal.

Breaking the terms of an end user agreement is not "illegal", you will not be prosecuted by the authorities for it. It's a civil matter. might get you sued, but I don't think the FBI will be chasing after iPhone hackers any time soon.

what about the way the hacking works? If I remember each hack uses an exploit of the software in order to install software that didn't belong on the phone.

Is not exploiting a security whole considered a crime? Or is it only a crime when its malicious? Is it not malicious to program the phone from using a security exploit to alter the phone to run not as it was intended?

Isnt running on non contracted networks considered malicious to both ATT and Apple as they are not benefitting from the agreement the end user made when they purchased the phone?

It sounds like these are just excuses to make it seem like hackers are law abiding. Sure they dont mean to harm Apple in this case but that doesnt mean the means to which they are doing it are legal.

idiot!!! Can't u see how apple and att are fucking you for your money...overpricing plans n the phone...yet u still defend them while they swim in ur dollars...hacking a phone is like buying a house n fixing it up...its
urs as long as there are no life threats, ur fine

What is truely sad is that people buy into the polico garbage that apple and ATT themselves feed into the population to make you feel sorry for a corporation that makes you use a machine that you purchased with your own money (and did not sign a contract for at the point of purchase) in only one intended way. I will not point fingers, but the dull pain of communism comes to mind. Since when are you required to watch TV with only one one station from one provider. Just because they make it a rule, does not mean that the rule is just. They paid for it, so they do with it what they want. I love apple, but they paid off ThinkSecret to keep their mouth shut...how legal is that?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH ARE YOU SERIOUSLY SCARED????? hacking an iphone is like running linux on a 2nd gen ipod. nobody cares