Hackintoshes spreading

|
Share

The Hackintosh phenomenon seems to be going mainstream.  Gizmodo did a headline story today on making a Dell Mini 9 ($245) into a working Macintosh.  This is not just some proof of concept but something that actually works well (at least on the throne according to the author, John Mahoney).  Boing Boing has been all over this for a few months and there was the Wired MSI Wind instructional webpage that Apple asked be shut down.   It is everywhere and people are using these devices as work tools.  People who use them, just like John Mahoney, swear by them.

We'd have to agree.  From our experience, the finished product actually works out pretty well. (We have a HP Mini 1000 and what should be the best/fastest  Netbook Hackintosh of them all, an EEE Mini 1000HE en route).

Is this really wrong? 

That depends a lot on how it is done, where you live and your view on the Apple EULA.  The EULA specifically says you are not to put the Mac OS on anything that isn't a Mac.  Pretty cut and dry no?  Not exactly.  The Psystar case is currently being tried to see if that clause is legitimate/enforceable in the US.   PearC computers in Germany seem to think that in Germany, once you buy a computer and some software, they are yours to do what you want with (can you use the DVD as a weapon like a ninja star?).  Apple hasn't yet taken them on. 

It is hard to argue that going out, buying a Leopard DVD and using it to install Mac OSX on your computer can be wrong.  We're sure many of you won't see it that way and will put nasty things in the comments.  To each, their own.

Realistically speaking, most hackers are probably downloading the hacked version of OSX Leopard off of a torrent.  There is no doubt that this is illegal and immoral.  Would they pay $140 to do this legitimately?  Perhaps.

So maybe we should ask: Why does it exist?  Why aren't people just happy buying an Apple laptop (or desktop)?  Why do they want to go and buy a competitor's laptop (usually paying a Microsoft Tax on it) and going through all of the trouble of hacking the bootloader and installing an OS on there that its developers don't want you to install and usually pay a bunch of money doing so.  In the mean time they are throwing out your copy of Windows XP that they own and legitimately belongs on the machine.

Sure OSX is better than Windows.  But is it that much better on a Netbook?  Sort of.  For us, we're used to OSX and switching mindsets when going to the Windows Netbook is tedious.  We use Windows in VirtualBox when necessary on our Macs but it isn't our preference.  We'd imagine there are a lot of others out there like us.

So, why not buy an additional Mac?  Apple doesn't make one anywhere near the form factor of a Netbook.  Sure the Air is thin, but the footprint is as big as a MacBook and more than twice the area of a small Netbook.  The EEE fits into the front pocket of a backpack or a woman's purse.  It is also not too worrying if it breaks, it costs less than a quarter of what a MacBook Air costs.  These are important realities, especially when everyone is pinching pennies these days. 

So right or wrong, Apple's fault for not making the hardware, Microsoft's fault for not making good enough software, it really doesn't matter.  The economics are there, the market is there and it really it isn't that difficult, and frankly, it is kinda cool. 

Unless something drastically changes, Hackintoshes are only going to become more popular.

 

Comments (34)

The funny part is - I'm quite sure that Dell's ability to support Mac OS X on their hardware is a bit better than their ability to support Windows.

Yes, I can tell you stories - busted Dell printer drivers, busted video drivers ad nauseam... I doubt their hardware was designed for XP, so I doubt Mac OS would fare any worse.

You know, you are right.  Also makes you wonder who is behind Psystar

"Unless something drastically changes, Hackintoshes are only going to become more popular."

and make life hard for honest mac users, that will brunt the extra cost of osx and potential new security problems (serialisation / authntication

Gizmodo writing about Hachintosh does not mean it's going mainsteam. Mainstream is when your mum asks about it.

Apple should abandon the retail box version of OSX and supply updates similar to the way the iPhone is updated. If you have a valid piece of hardware, you get the update. Point updates are handled in this way now, not a big leap to do version upgrades.

As long as Apple is ignoring the fact that people need hardware which can be scaled to their needs, they are missing the boat.
I have tried Leopard on Netbooks, but this sucks in the long run. Now I am trying Leopard on microATX boards which allow me to connect HDMI or (true) DisplayPort displays, also allowing for swapping disk- and various other things "for the rest of us".

Apple is ignoring completely the midrange, scaleable PC-range. A monolthic MacPro does not appeal me at all. A Mac mini is too small. iMacs are too closed.

Apple should open themself into a new and innovative midrange which combines the ease of an iMac, the versatiltiy of the Pro and the footprint of the mini. If they proof to deliver this challenge, I will keep on going to pay them for their hardware.

As I do so since the Mac Plus in 1986.

I'm always astounded at how ignorant the general populace and even people who should know better are of exactly what an EULA actually is. It is *not* a piece of legislation signed into law; it is a contract. A contract is much more open to interpretation than a law. Buying OS X and loading it on non-Apple hardware is not an illegal (i.e. criminal) activity, because (DMCA aswide) there is no law stating you can not do so. The onus is on Apple to prove that the user who chose to engage in said activity violated the contract between the user and Apple. And then, if that can be successfully argued by Apple, the courts would have to decide what (if any) damages to award Apple. Damages are civil in nature and typically based upon any income Apple would have lost from the breach of contract. So, if I bought the Leopard DVD from the Apple store and loaded it on my non-Apple hardware, what exactly did Apple lose in income from my alleged breach of contract? A smart defense lawyer could probably successfully argue that Apple has lost nothing, and in fact Apple gained income. Bottom line: so long as Apple continues to *not* offer the product that people want, people are going to create the product they want, sometimes through very clever means that are difficult to combat. The day Apple releases a kick@ss netbook, this tricky problem for Apple will nearly evaporate. But the longer they delay, the harder it is to combat.

gimme a break...

Apple offers products that A LOT of people want. But they aren't perfect. They have consistently ignored lots of consumer wishes and requests along the way, but have also managed to bust out some monumental and amazing products. So cool it when you knock at 'em for not making every single little thing that would be "cool" but isn't made in mass.

But what's Apple's benefit for making a NetBook? They can't compete with the likes of the PC NetBooks at their $300-$500 prices. They have been trying to position their iPhones & iPod Touches as hand-held computers for the last couple of years, and any computer in this price range would cannabilize sales from those devices. So where do you put the price point then, $600-800? C'mon. That's almost 2x as much as the PC NetBooks, with the top-end not being far from the MacBook, so you'd cannabilize sales from the MacBook, all the while having the uninformed say you're still more expensive than PCs. And you know that Apple would not bring their game as far as specs are concerned... they never do. They only bring out what's necessary. So it's a losing game from a business perspective.

Lastly, NetBooks, are crap. Although they have improved tremendously over the last year+, are essentially cheaper crappier, stripped down versions of PC laptops. I use a PC laptop on a daily basis. And I don't know what would possess someone to buy a cheap, stripped down version of this crap.

I also have a couple of Macs. And honestly, I don't want a stripped down version of them. No way. They do what they're supposed to do well, look great, and last long. Cheapen that, and well, then it's just not appealling.

If you have a well-made laptop, and you take some simple precautions, then you don't really have to worry about it falling apart, or breaking. I dropped my TiBook G4/400 maybe 3 or 4 times, and it's still running like a champ. I fear what would happen if I dropped my ThinkPad. And I'm afraid to hold some of those NetBooks wrong, that they might just break in my hands, or if I look at them wrong.

A new Apple, sure.
A NetBook, no thanks.

P.S. I'm broke, and nothing intrigues me more than a good deal. But as the adage goes, the cheap stuff ends up costing more in the long-run.

your comment is brilliant. I didn't even finish reading it yet, but had to say that this argument is genius. You're absolutely right. There is no place for an apple netbook. It's like el jobso said, they don't know how to make cheap, pos laptops...

Agreed that it would be hard to make a cheap Mac at the right price point. Even Prince Jobs has said it's not easy for them to make a cheap netbook that "isn't a piece of trash."

But you can drop a ThinkPad and it doesn't even blink-- the things are made like tanks. Lenovo/IBM's utilities aren't very well done, but the hardware, down to the hinges and bolts for the display lid, are second to none, even a MacBook.

OS X + ThinkPad could be a very formidable combination, one that could give Apple's hardware side a run for its money. A good thing, IMO.

The talk about the EULA calling it a contract is right. And the fact that people miss is that it is a contract that you can take or leave. Apple is saying in the EULA essentially "If you want to use OS X, you need to use Apple branded hardware. You have a problem? Don't use OS X." Any argument that Apple has a monopoly is wrong, there are other operating systems, you just don't want to use them. It's like ripping a song off a CD and putting it into a movie you do. Just because you bought the song and have the ability to use it elsewhere doesn't mean you have the right to. OS X is Apple's intellectual property.

And to answer the what does Apple have to lose question from B3ND3R's post. Apple's business model is a closed "ecosystem" of products. They can argue that they're losing profits because they charge a lower cost for their OS disc due to it being an upgrade off of a previously sold license and so they have subsidized a portion of the cost. And flat out on contracts, if you accept the contract you accept it. You can't renege just because you feel like it on some random day. To use OS X, you need to use Apple hardware. It's just part of the deal you accept when you boot it up. Got a problem? Find a new operating system to use.

scubamatt614 is right. People who argue Apple is not damaged when people buy their software and put in on non-Apple hardware ignore the fact that Apple needs the profits from hardware sales to support software development. How else do you think they can develop software that's superior to Windows with 1/20th of the market share? Apple also suffers damage to their reputation when they get blamed for crashes due to hardware incompatibilities they cannot control. Next the same people will be arguing that Apple has an obligation to support third-party hardware.

As for "illegal" versus "breach of contract," after practicing law for 27+ years I think i understand the difference. This is simple hair splitting that's intended to obfuscate the issues. It is not "legal" to breach a lawful contract. Civil law is still law and the fact that you can't go to jail for it (which is not absolutely clear here, by the way, given the criminal provisions in the DMCA and copyright law itself) doesn't make it "legal."

By the way, giving legal advice (such as what is legal and what isn't) without a license to practice law IS illegal, in the criminal sense.

they can just retire everybody who works at Apple from the interest on their bank account.

...I see with people's claims that if they buy a copy of the OS, that they have the right to use it as they see fit, is that this is not a retail copy, but an upgrade copy. A true retail copy would likely be double the price or more. I mean, honestly, look at Windows pricing. If Apple were to sell you a true retail copy, then it would cost you $300. When people start sending $300 to Apple, I'll start to listen to their moralizing about hackintoshes.

Wrong? I don't think so. I have a p35-d3l/quad core system I built to play games with. As it turns out, the p35-ds3l is one of those motherboards that is almost 100% compatable with OSX and boot 132. I installed from a vanilla OSX disk I purchased and have "mac" that's 100% compatable and uses software update just like any other Mac. And I paid a fraction of the cost for it, and can update the hardware to my hearts content.


I was so happy with it I went out and bought a Apple aluminum keyboard so I could use the Dashboard keys,etc. Does this mean I would spring for a full blown Mac? Never. Never in a million years, especially now that it's been shown that they can be built and run on hardware that's a fraction of the cost of the "real thing". I fully plan to purchase a mini 9 and put OSX on it as well.


The os is golden, but the hardware is just marked up PC parts and a whole lot of people are starting to realize that, especially in this economy when it pays to be frugal and make intelligent decisions when making a big purchase.


I'm not sure how Apple is going to take on this Notebook thing, people clearly love them and want OSX on it yet Apple continues to shun that market because frankly it's too low brow and low price for them to bother with without cannibalizing their upstream sales. Such is the price you pay when you artificially control the market you operate in.


Rock and a hard place for Apple here. My prediction is an all out legal assault soon on the websites and people making all this possible. There's nothing else they can do.

Yesterday I stumbled over a poll on MsiWind.net about the OS used:

OSX 39%
Windows 26%
Dual Boot 19%
GNU/Linux based 16%

http://msiwind.net/

@ Vis

"Wrong? I don't think so."

"The os is golden"

I'm glad you think so. I also wonder what OS you'd choose if Apple decided to drop out of the PC market because it's model had been defeated by wide spread hanintoshism?

Apple can only afford to make such a great OS, and keep a boxed retail version affordable, because of the hardware profit.

I would also argue that Apple can be more radical with it's OS updates because it's not the only reason people choose to upgrade - people upgrade to get a fancy new machine too. If they don't like a feature of the new OS they'll have to cope because they want a glass track pad.

M$ can't afford to take such risks as there are fewer reasons to upgrade.

I think that for the mainstream, OS's are less and less important anyway. We're already seeing netbooks bypass the OS to offer mainstream functionality.

FYI the French website macgeneration has tested the PearC German "Mac OSX PC"...

http://www.macgeneration.com/news/voir/133854/pearc-le-clone-mac-alleman...

(I do not work for them...)

So,let´s get started:

How exactly is your duct-taped gaming rig a Mac?
Because you installed OS X from a disk you "purchased" (read: downloaded from some torrent site) on your machine?
A Mac has always had both software and hardware components,you chose to implant one part of said components into your computer.
This combination is both the Mac´s strength and weakness,however,it is completely up to Apple to choose their business model.
As some others have already pointed out, by buying the OS you are entering into a contract with Apple,one nobody really forces you to enter in the first place.

You are implying that due to "the economy" people will suddenly flock to building their own systems.
This requires time , motivation and skill.
I for once have built plenty of rigs over time but am certainly not motivated to do that anymore,also I do not really have the time for it.
Buying a complete package means I do not have to deal with multiple warranties (as is the case with building your own system), no need to fart around with configurations and the like.
Since you probably still inhabit Mom´s basement time is not an issue for you.

Apple has plenty of ways to at least reduce the number of Hackintoshes .
There are ways included in Leopard,there are the court of laws and of course potential business strategies.
Most of all there is the option of extending their product line.
Should Apple ever decide to go nuclear via Software,you will of course be the first in line to complain on "the Intaweb" and to your mom about how evil Apple is for keeping you from ripping them off.

This covers most of it I suppose.

Apple will hardware lock the operating system with the next update (Snow Leopard) .. MARK MY WORDS !

Well, the way i see it, i feel that if you actually buy a mac AND buy OS X, you could put it on ONE other machine. Honestly, i bough a MacBook Pro and haven't even considered touching another computer. They're expensive for a reason and i plan to have it for years to come (its one year old right now and still runs perfectly).

The one solution that Apple would probably come up with is . . . you guess it . . . an activation system. They'll be forced to use serials and all that stuff that frustrates people trying to pirate windows. they will fear updating because technically OS X would never be truly activated. I forget who said it earlier to try and make it like the iPhone which would only update if it detects the right hardware.

although i truly admit that hackintoshes are wrong, i do want one, although not for day to day use. The only reason that i would want one is because i'm the only mac user in my family and want a macintosh desktop just to sync music, larger screen (i don't have the money for an Apple display), and have some extra space to put old documents, etc. I do admit that they are wrong, but i wouldn't be too upset if someone used a hackintosh like 1 or 2 times a week, just not for day to day use.

whatever the desicion by apple, i hope that they can continue to provide me with great product because i will faithfully buy from them in the future.

only 4 months to Snow Leopard!!!!!  (if June release date)

Mac User

"Once you go Mac, you'll never go back"

 

MacBook Pro (early 2008)

2.4ghz, 4g RAM, Leopard 10.5.6

People talk about "if you buy it you can put it on any machine you want." But there is also no piracy protection in OS X dvds. So anyone can just download leopard and put it on a hackintosh without any purchase or money going to Apple. So now we can look forward to long serial numbers, online activations, and all of the annoyances that have been around on the windows side of things for years that we haven't had to deal with.

I honestly hope there is a way to stop this phenomenon that doesn't punish the people that do play by Apple's rules. (and have no problem with it.)

I have a MacBook Pro, I'm quite happy with it, I don't need a little tiny notebook. I've been using Macs since the Mac Plus, and even worked for Apple for 5 years. Wife and son #2 have notebooks, son #1 has an LCD iMac.

I still want to build a Hackintosh. I want a rack mounted home theatre PC, like this: http://www.atechfabrication.com/atech_6000_order_form.htm

If you look at the prices, I'm not lusting after one of these to pay less than I'd pay for a Mac.

My Xserve sits in a rack at a data centre. It's too loud to have in the house. It doesn't fit into my stereo cabinet.

I want a Mac with Blue Ray Drive, Rack Mounted, HDMI out to run a 52" Sharp LCD. I want lots of drive space for all my music, movies, photos. I want PCI based Digital Audio out.
I want a Tuner card in it and I'd use it as a DVR.

I'd like to use it as my Time Machine backup repository.

It would also be AppleTV, Airport Extreme and home based router. With multiple NIC's it could handle and route to both Cable Internet, HSA DSL, NAT'd home network, and WPA2 Wireless.

The Mac Pro is about as close as you get. It doesn't fit into my stereo cabinet. It's also not black, like the rest of my gear, and it's not rack mountable.

An HTPC form factor case would be a god send for small office server, musicians, editing suites, post production houses, and yes, even ISP's. (Yes people run ISP's using Macs. I have since 1992)

I've actually had custom made rack mount cases manufactured in the past for G3's and G4's. I was a big customer of Marathon when they made rails and rack kits for Macs.

The only option at the moment to comply fully would be to buy a Mac Pro, gut it, and stick the bits into the ATech case. That would probably end up costing close to $10k.

Sometimes if they don't make what you want, you have to make it yourself.

Some people might do it to save money, I just want a form factor they don't offer. If this was available from Apple, I'd buy it tomorrow.

Oh, and Steve, this is what I meant by convergence. Not "Watching TV on your Toaster"

Do you really believe that people doing this are actually buying a copy of OS X Leopard?

LOL, BS they are pirating Leopard. You can download it and instructions on how to do the hack it on various sites.

All of you who think that this is somehow going to help Apple are full of it.

I would like to know if the majority of hackintoshers out there aren't Mac owners and users in the first place. After all, as neat as trying a different OS on your netbook is, you end up living with your usual apps and compatible data. If you are primarily a Windows user, I don't think you are too keen to netbook with OS X long term, really.

I am a Mac owner (from an Apple IIe to my current Mac Pro) and I intend to go hackintosh as soon as the new Ion platform gets out there (either I get an Ion-based netbook or an older generation one if they get cheaper). I bought a Samsung NC-10 as a present to my brother, and it was a supersweet machine, so I don't think the segment is crap at all. Plus I am not so enamored of Apple's hardware as to get religious about it (I've suffered some expensive HW catastrophes): certainly, i wasn't going to buy a MacBook anytime soon before the netbooks appeared in the market.

If Apple decides to produce a MacBook Mini, they better price it reasonably. And I think they'll have to do something: their educational market is going to feel the pressure, at the very least.

I agree with the above that those building hackitoshes are probably not buying the OSX software.

If this becomes mainstream and the clones appear in the same way it did for IBM and Windows, three things could happen:

1. Apple will jack up the price of OSX.

2. Apple will start using serial numbers and requiring a valid machine SN to install.

3. Apple expected this to happen at some point and believe that clones will be neccessary to increase user base beyond 20%.

interesting. where did my previous comment go? it was here the day i posted it and now it's gone. WTF??

Of course this is wrong. You are using something of value that isn't yours without permission. It obviously has value. Your wanting to use it is proof of that. It obviously isn't yours. if it was you wouldn't have to get it from somewhere else. It's obviously without permission. Apple has made that clear.

People can twist and turn all they want. The bottom line is that simple grade school ethics makes the answer obvious. OS X isn't yours to use anyway you want without permission.

so another thought just occured to me. If hackintosh computers are becoming so popular, whats gonna happen to windows? everyone will just wipe windows for their hackintosh. Windows might finally drop significantly. of course we'll have to wait until after windows 7 comes out. from what i know, a lot of people switched to macs because vista was just a bunch of ****. windows 7 comes out and maybe there will be another huge switch. idk. IMO i can hope that this will in some way damage microsoft.

Mac User

"Once you go Mac, you'll never go back"

 

MacBook Pro (early 2008)

2.4ghz, 4g RAM, Leopard 10.5.6

"is that this is not a retail copy, but an upgrade copy. "

Then it needs to say so, clearly and unambiguously, on the outside of the box.

As in Mac OS X Leopard Upgrade.

Failure to do so is false advertising. Putting Macintosh computer in the small type system requirements implies that is the official supported hardware list, not that you are buying an upgrade instead of a full installation set.

Interestingly, in Germany Apple's EULA is not binding, as it is not on the outside of the box. Hiding it in the fine print inside the box or referring you to a website is apparently not legal.

This hackintosh movement was inevitable once Apple went to Intel/commodity parts, and with the base OS open source (Mach/BSD). They have multiple ways to lock down Snow Leopard, but all of them will annoy some set of their customers. We'll have to see which one they pick.

But right now you can get an OS X capable PC that will outperform the iMacs for half the money, and this includes the monitor. The Leopard + iLife + iWork combo is only $170. That leaves a lot of "profit" for the technically adept.