Early 2010 Mac Pros to have Intel Core i9 processors with 24 logical cores?
If things progress as expected, the next Mac Pro won't have any problem competing with high end iMacs for the speed crown amongst Apple machines. HardMac (via MacRumors) profiles the next generation Intel "Gulftown" Core i9 processors which they expect to see in high end Mac Pros in early 2010. The processor's benchmarks were "released early" by PCLAB.pl.
The skinny is this: The smaller 32nm process die and 50% more transistors allows the processors to operate 50% faster while using 10-50% less power:
First figures indicate that this CPU is very promising. At equivalent clock speed, it is 50% faster than the corresponding quad core Xeon for parallel tasks. Despite having 50% more transistors, the CPU strongly benefits from 32-nm engraving as it drains 50% less power in idle mode and 10% less in full loading mode.
How do you arrive at 24 processors from six cores? With a dual-chip configuration (12 real cores) and threading available on these chips which enables each core (24) to function as two, you get two dozen logical cores to work with.
Current Mac Pros top out at dual 2.93Ghz quad core Intel Xeon processors. Snow Leopard's Grand Central Dispatch technology should allow the Mac OS to take full advantage of many cores (both real and virtual via threading) offered by the new Core i9 line of processors.
Latest Stories on 9 to 5 Mac
- Apple patents the 3D Apple Store - Alice in Avatar-land
- Surprise: Warner admits iTunes sales slow on price hikes
- Apple ships Aperture 3: 64-bit, Snow Leopard/Intel only, 200 features, $199/£169 (demo available)
- What's coming to the Apple Store this morning?
- Apple Store Down. Can we has Core i7 MacBook Pros?
- Apple podcasts Mac advice video clips
- iPhone gains, BlackBerry loses US smartphone marketshare


Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Comments (16)
Will we finally be able to visit sites with Flash and not have the fans spin full-speed?
Each of the 17 FLV components on this page alone can now get it's own set of cores allocated to it. So the Flash ads you enjoy most will be able to deliver higher quality images and sound. No more bogging down to display your favorite web site!
Kill flash unless you need it.
you should try clicktoflash, it disables flash from loading unless you specifically request it by clicking the placeholder.
"Snow Leopard'sOpenCL technology should allow the Mac OS to take full advantage of many cores (both real and virtual via threading) offered by the new Core i9 line of processors."
I think the use of Grand Central will enable usage of the multi cores.
Once we have software that takes advantage of Grand Central then there should be an advantage to using Macs.
Interesting times.
The sooner Flash dies, the better.
<video> with H.264 is the future.
Flash sucks in OS X, but it works really well in Windows (one of the few things Windows does right).
I agree that .h264 SHOULD be the future, but in the meantime, Apple should still get their act together and make flash work properly NOW.
Are you some sort of retard?
Flash is made by Adobe, not Apple.
You don't seem to be aware that Flash already supports H.264. I agree that Flash should die, but if anything is going to kill it, then it will be HTML 5.
nothing about that post made it seem like he thought apple made flash.
Are you some sort of retard too?
FTW
Whatever the actual processors are on machines, I don't think apple will close the gap in their performance. My money is on that Apple is making the mac pros more and more for those who NEED speed and expansion for work and pushing the laptops and iMacs for everyone else.
Hope they come out in Q1 of 2010, cause I want one!
Damn! I was all set to get a 27" i7 but now will wait. Need speed but could buy at 27' i7 + a 15' MPB for the price of the Mac Pro plus a monitor. Decisions, decisions.
Thank God I bought a Macmini, no problem loading this site even with all the Flash ads. Not that I wouldn't pay to see Adobe and Flash die.