You're right on. Sure, Apple workstations/server aren't everywhere, but that says little of their true capability. Leopard is certified Unix and is capable of running any Unix application.
But the ringer here is the "crappiness" of Apple workstations and the "silliness" of Apple servers. To say this kind of thing is ludicrous and reflects badly on the capacity for reason of the poster. I believe any reasonably open administrator will look favorably on Apple servers (especially in the event that Apple provides a fully-featured business solution such as in the article). And to bash Apple workstations is simply 'silly'.
The likelihood that the poster has had much experience with either Apple servers or workstations is negligible.
You're right on. Sure, Apple
You're right on. Sure, Apple workstations/server aren't everywhere, but that says little of their true capability. Leopard is certified Unix and is capable of running any Unix application.
But the ringer here is the "crappiness" of Apple workstations and the "silliness" of Apple servers. To say this kind of thing is ludicrous and reflects badly on the capacity for reason of the poster. I believe any reasonably open administrator will look favorably on Apple servers (especially in the event that Apple provides a fully-featured business solution such as in the article). And to bash Apple workstations is simply 'silly'.
The likelihood that the poster has had much experience with either Apple servers or workstations is negligible.