Beatles: "Discussions regarding digital distribution will continue"

|
Share

The Beatles may be the most successful band in history and may have captured and inspired the minds of a generation, but when it comes to the online music world, they remain a few steps away from “Revolution Number 9”, or so it appears.

The long-running rumour that music from the band may eventually make it to iTunes has a long and storied history. It is part of the regular hubbub of chatter which pops up from time-to-time. It seems to have a life of its own.

We’ve even noted here that the mooted (but don’t forget, still not officially confirmed) September 9 iPod product refresh Apple keynote may see music from the band at last appear on iTunes. That’s because the band’s label, Apple Corps. will release The Stereo Albums boxed set on that day, as will the Beatle’s Rock Band game make its debut.

To the strains of “Revolution Number 9”, some observed the date - 9/9/09 - could be perfectly starred for music from the band to make it online, particularly given the coincidence between Apple Corps. and Apple Inc.’s September 9 event date.

We’re sorry to report that Apple Corps. has since made a slight move to defer this speculation, with an updated press release announcing the band’s boxed set now saying: "Discussions regarding the digital distribution of the catalog will continue. There is no further information available at this time."

More on the boxed set, which also drove speculation the music would be made available within Apple’s rumoured Cocktail format: “For a limited period, each CD will also be embedded with a brief documentary film about the album. On the same date, two new Beatles boxed CD collections will also be released.”

“Within each CD's new packaging, booklets include detailed historical notes along with informative recording notes. With the exception of the 'Past Masters' set, newly produced mini-documentaries on the making of each album, directed by Bob Smeaton, are included as QuickTime files on each album. The documentaries contain archival footage, rare photographs and never-before-heard studio chat from The Beatles, offering a unique and very personal insight into the studio atmosphere.”

Now that Apple Corps. has changed its tune slightly, speculation can still continue, after all, are the two Apple brands simply trying to quell such discussion so as to make a bigger splash when they announce the news? Or do fans of The Beatles have to continue to wait while Apple Corp’s digital music release discussions wend their way down the ‘Long And Winding Road’.

We’ll see. We do think Apple Corps. needs to get something going on digital downloads, as fans will eventually become frustrated at the delay of such an initiative...

Comments (20)

I think the september event WILL bring the Beatles to the iTunes store....would make perfect sense....rumors said that apple is trying to invent a new way to increase album sales....bringing out the beatles albums withe the new bonus material would be the perfect start....and maybe to get this whole thing into a bigger light - they'll also introduce the rumored 6 inch ipod touch with the iPhone 3.0 OS which can perfectly play the new content - maybe in HD!!???
and the next keynote will bring the 10inch tablet with snow leopard in it.....

I think they should let their music be sold on iTunes.
It makes no sense to give the go-ahead on a Rockband Beatles game and then say no-no to digital distribution.
It's coming. Don't know when, but I hope it's this year.

Does anyone seriously think that anyone is really waiting for this?
Anyone who remotely has any interest in the beatles has already downloaded whatever music they wanted.

When it is finally announced in 2030 no one will notice.

I've been waiting for this.

I grew up in the Beatles era so in theory should be interested, but...

...zzz... yawn... oops, dropped off, now where was I?

Oh yes: boring; so what.

The generation who buys the most songs from iTunes doesn't even know who the Beatles are. Those kids who do probably refer to them as "mom and dad's music" and don't want any of those songs on their iPods.

EVERYONE knows who the Beatles are. If you really love rock n roll, all roads lead to the Beatles. They influenced so much. An 18 year old might not buy it now, but he might 5 or 10 years from now. You find music that is "new" to you, even it is not new. I have a 22 year old daughter who "discovered" the Beatles and now likes them.

I've have always heard Paul McCartney HATED Revolution 9. It was Yoko Ono's crap. This was a very strong rift in the group and one of the reasons she is described as "breaking up the Beatles."

Actually, the date reference is from "One After 909", not "Revolution 9". 9-9-09. Guess ya gotta be a Beatles fan to get it...

I bought the Beatles CDs I wanted MANY years ago. I may repurchase the digital remasters.

But I am NOT going to wait for them to appear on iTunes or Amazon as digital downloads.

Have we really become THAT lazy that we can't spend 5 minutes ripping a CD? God help us if so!

There is no frustration here. It's not like you can't get the Beatles on your iPod if you want them there.

You have to drive to the store, spend $25 on the whole CD at once, drive home, rip the CD, then put it on your iTunes collection .... nah, I'll just wait. It will only be 1-3 years.

If people don't want to buy the CDs, you can't stop them.

 

I admit to being lazy on this. If you REALLY want something, you will get it. If you only casually want something, no. There are songs that I want that are not on iTunes, but I usually don't get them. A big thing is being able to buy it while you are in the mood to hear it.

Or you could surf over to Amazon and pick them up used or from a 3rd party seller, often at a signficiant discount, and get them that way.

I LOVE iTunes-don't get me wrong. The point is, well BFD, so the Beatles aren't on iTunes!?!

I listen to trance and a LOT of the music I listen to isn't either. But even if it was, I can usually get the CD from Amazon for cheaper than iTunes. Then I actually HAVE THE MUSIC if something goes wrong with my HD. I do use the iTunes purchases back-up, but using it to restore the itunes library is at least as much of a hassle as ripping the cd.

Or you could surf over to Amazon and pick them up used or from a 3rd party seller, often at a significant discount, and get them that way.

I LOVE iTunes-don't get me wrong. The point is, well BFD, so the Beatles aren't on iTunes!?!

I listen to trance and a LOT of the music I listen to isn't either. But even if it was, I can usually get the CD from Amazon for cheaper than iTunes. Then I actually HAVE THE MUSIC if something goes wrong with my HD. I do use the iTunes purchases back-up, but using it to restore the itunes library is at least as much of a hassle as ripping the cd.

"The generation who buys the most songs from iTunes doesn't even know who the Beatles are. Those kids who do probably refer to them as "mom and dad's music" and don't want any of those songs on their iPods."

Quick, hurry up and tell MTV and EA to put a stop to the Rock Band: Beatles concept. The kids'll never buy it. He knows, he's got his finger right on the pulse of today's youth. Asshat.

You are correct sir. I am amongst today's youth (The Approximately 18 years old demographic) and I love the Beatles. Lots of my friends and cohorts like the Beatles, or at least like some of their songs. If Beatles songs were on iTunes, a whole bunch of teenagers would snap up the hits and some of them, like me, would buy pretty much the entire catalogue.

The Beatles transcend their era. They are the biggest god damn band in the history of rock and roll music.

Funny, without the music being available on iTunes I've got all the Beatles music I want on my computer and iPhone. How ever could I have done that?

I for one don't care about if the beatles are on iTunes or not. I think most people don't care either.

I for one don't care about if the beatles are on iTunes or not. I think most people don't care either.

Apple and The Beatles will eventually come to terms. And, when they do, The Beatles music will sell well on Itunes. But, I doubt it's going to be the blockbuster everyone anticipates. Their music has been out on CD for a long time. Those who really want it have probably already bought the cd's and ripped them, or pulled them down off a p2p network. So, it's not like there's a huge, pent up demand.

A year and a half ago when he talked to the British press about all this, McCartney strongly suggested that the problem lay between Apple Corps and EMI, their longtime archenemies.

Not with Apple iTunes, or MicroSoft or anybody else who wanted to release the digital catalog. Apparently it all came down to how much of a piece of the pie EMI wanted to grab, and the decades-long ill will between the Beatles and their former label.

I don't know how Rockband fits in there, but EMI might have been forced to agree they got no rights from that, whereas maybe the Beatles are arguing that digital is a new market and EMI gets nothing, whilst EMI is saying this is just like CDs or cassette tapes, and that the old onerous profit 'sharing' deal must apply here as well, and EMI must have their pound of flesh?