AT&T, O2 wave bye-bye to iPhone exclusivity, Gene Munster suggests
Those cosy exclusive deals between Apple and carriers including AT&T and O2 may be on the way out, as the company seeks to widen market share and regulators ponder the significance of these deals as they examine the business methods of the wireless industries.
We’ve heard plenty of reports suggesting Apple plans to at least partially abandon these exclusive tie-ups.
Doing so makes lots of sense, on the one hand those firms with exclusive distro deals for iPhone seem to attract complaints at the patchiness of their networks; the other reason, of course, is to boost market share of the iPhone. There’s plenty of potential customers out there who just don’t want to be vassal to AT&T or O2, just in order to get hold of an iPhone.
Movement in AT&T’s competitor, Verizon. shares in the last few days has been pretty active, lending support to notions that some industry gossip predicts something from the company. Could this be a September 9 announcement of wider distribution for the iPhone? We don’t think so, but we do see some kind of tablet-laced tie-in in future.
We can’t say for sure, so you’ll have to pop that notion in your air-locked speculation chamber, but it marries sundry rumors, rumors which have legs according to an analyst this morning.
As explained by the beard and Jim Dalrymple this morning, Piper Jaffray analyst, Gene Munster has issued new guidance in which he claims Apple will transition to a multiple carrier model for the iPhone within the next year, “most likely next summer”.
“The multiple carrier scenario is not new for Apple. In France, for example, the company moved from an exclusive arrangement with Orange to a multi-carrier deal. According to Munster, this led to greater success for the iPhone in that country,” Dalrymple notes, observing Apple to have around a 40 per cent market share in France, in contrast to lower numbers in countries currently doomed to exclusive deals with carriers.
It’s around this stage we’d respectfully suggest AT&T begins to emulate Adobe by beginning to put into effect a little more transparency and a better feedback loop (and coverage) for its customers. That’s if it wants to keep the market share gains it acquired from offering the iPhone.
Munster also informs Apple has no plan for a cheap mass market iPhone ever, a $30-40 subscription TV service on iTunes to compete with cable. These nuggets are all available over at Fortune.
Latest Stories on 9 to 5 Mac
- Apple patents the 3D Apple Store - Alice in Avatar-land
- Surprise: Warner admits iTunes sales slow on price hikes
- Apple ships Aperture 3: 64-bit, Snow Leopard/Intel only, 200 features, $199/£169 (demo available)
- What's coming to the Apple Store this morning?
- Apple Store Down. Can we has Core i7 MacBook Pros?
- Apple podcasts Mac advice video clips
- iPhone gains, BlackBerry loses US smartphone marketshare


Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Comments (32)
Good. Do it. Then everyone can complain about Verizon.
The point is there will be subscribers on both AT&T and Verizon. I'm assuming here that the iphone in question will be a new one based on LTE 4G wireless tech. But I have a feeling that the first device on Verizon's LTE network from Apple won't be a new iphone. *hint hint* :)
So?
So two networks are better than one.
At this year's SXSW in Austin, AT&T's network got overloaded from all the iPhones in one area. AT&T says that iPhone users tend to use 2-4x as much bandwidth as other smartphone users.
So if you had a collection of 10,000 people and, say, half of them were on AT&T and the other half were on T-Mobile, you'd have less congestion.
Pretty simple, really.
You really, must, must, must get your word in.
Not so simple really. If it is, go create a wireless carrier yourself or shut up.
if it is so simple, just create your own carrier since yo uhave all of the answer keyboard monkey
if it is so simple, just create your own carrier since you have all of the answers keyboard monkey
Hey, little kids, break it up.
make me
I don't remember Gene Munster being right one single time..
Are you kidding? He is one of the leading analysts of coverage for Apple and has a track record of showing his "inside" sources are generally accurate. For the most part, when Gene Munster speaks the industry listens. Of course no analyst is 100% right but he certainly has the best record.
Haha, you must be in Opposite World, where everything that Gene Munster says is right.
Nuff said.
yea yea.. I'll believe it when I SEE it.
... T-Mobile.
They're the only cell phone company ranked in the top 20 of customer service (across all industries) plus they have the best plans available.
Everyone knows that Sprint is tops. Verizon sucks with their rip-off plans and caps; T-Mobile sucks with their 2G network.
Only Sprint has 4G today.
Pooppy Sprint sucks eggs.
T-mobile may have the best rates for your buck but not the 3g coverage the iPhone will demand. They just released their 3g network and while it's probably working well on their android devices it won't be equiped to handle the onslaught that the iPhone will bring to their 3g network. If you think that AT&T has problems handling their network with all the iPhones they have under their belt..... Well let me say that t-mobile's network would have a melt down. The iPhone is a bandwith hog. I know that there are a lot of unlocked iPhones on t-mobile but remember their not running in their 3g network. Then again I could be wrong. It's just a thought. Something to think about.
probably the least likely but to me the sprint network is the best and they probably wouldnt cripple the phone like verizon would
Yea, krippled fones aren't kool.
I believe it.
blah blah blah blah blah......
yada, yada, yada, yada.....
There are just as many Verizon subscribers unhappy with their signal quality. Another point is, there are tons of smartphones that can do everything the iPhone can.
spoken like someone that doesn't own an iPhone. The appstore makes the iPhone and there is not a single smart phone that has an appstore like apple. not even close
I'll go with whoever has the better price. Frankly coverage is spotty with either one in the world in which I spend the most time.
I had Verizon for quite a long time and was very happy. My last phone with them was the LG Dare, because I wanted the closest thing to an iPhone I could get while still on Verizon. Well the LG Dare wasn't it.....there is nothing like the iPhone....period. (IMHO)
I can now sync with my MAC seamlessly, I have access to over 60, 000 apps, etc.
Is Verizon better over all....yes I still feel they are, but here is an interesting experience that I have had with the iPhone. I live in upstate NY and I go to my local Mall a lot, mostly BestBuy and other stores that carry technology in great array. So, with my Verizon phone I could barely get a signal while in the actual BestBuy store and would have to run outside the store when I got a call just to keep the signal, so people could hear me. However with my iPhone, it has not been a problem, I get almost full bars....not sure why.
Someone mentioned the basement test and I have to agree Verizon was better, barely got a signal with Verizon in my basement, but it was at least a little something. With my iPhone it's not better, but I would say on average the signal floats in and out. Verizon definitely worked better in my Basement. However, I am home....I have a land line.....I don't need my cell phone. I know some people do though.
Bottom line here folks is it's a PHONE first and foremost, so where ever you are in the country, you should use what works best for you. If you REALLY want the iPhone like I did, try AT&T in your area and you might be surprised, even after hearing all the horror stories. Love my iPhone...........
uhhh.. we didn't have to hear about your phones' life story.
Well if someone HAD taken the time to write something like this a while
ago.......for me, It would have helped.
Trust me, no more comments on this site.......it's hard to carry on actual beneficial dialogue with infants.
Yea, friggin' infants, they have nothing intelligent to say.