Apple iTunes $30/month bid to take-on Hulu and cable

|
Share

Remember all those rumours of Apple planning a subscription-based service for iTunes? The ones that began way back in 2005, when the company hired XBox Live staffer, Julia Miller?

Seems this chatter’s back again, with Peter Kafka’s MediaMemo claiming Apple to have been in talks with TV networks in an attempt to put together a $30 all-you-can-eat TV subscription service.

This service, which may well appeal to companies not yet signed-up to NBC,ABC and Fox's Hulu service, and which can also be seen as extending the Apple TV model into business currently occupied by satellite and cable TV services, seems set to launch “early next year”, if anyone signs up.

At present, Apple is assessing what degree of support there is for the notion among TV services.  Kafka says no one has yet signed up.

These subscription plans through iTunes wouldn’t be device-specific, though it is likely you’d be able to access content using iTunes clients, including computers, iPhones, iPods and Apple TV devices.

August saw similar reports, this time from Piper Jaffray analyst, Gene Munster, who predicted Apple would introduce subscription services for TV shows way back in August this year.

“Such a product would effectively replace a consumer’s monthly cable bill (~$85/month) and offer access to current and older episodes of select shows on select channels,” said Munster, according to Loop Insight.

Success will depend on Apple being able to offer the breadth of content you get from cable services and broadcasters. It would also depend on shows being made available in a timely fashion.

If the company succeeds in winning support from TV networks, it would enter a market currently served by Netflix, and Hulu; with YouTube also expected to offer full-length TV shows more widely in the coming year.

This means Apple has a chance at securing broadcaster permission for the plan, as they are more prepared to engage with online services now than before. One source told MediaMemo: “I think they might get it right this time”.

Apple may also have a surprise in its plan, in terms of enabling broadcasters to claw back a little of the ads revenue they would otherwise lose in ads-free subscriptions.

Apple has advanced plans for an ads-funded iTunes service.

These plans first came to light in July, when it was revealed that Apple presented a UK Judge-presided tribunal with advanced plans for an ads-funded service.

iTunes VP Eddie Cue told the Tribunal that iTunes would only pay advertising revenue where it is earned “as a result of an advertisement, sponsorship or a click-through link located on a Licensed service … and only where the Licensed Service is offered to the user at a price which has been artificially depressed to reflect such revenue.”

Comments (10)

This sounds awesome... accept it's Apple... and in my estimation Apple's content pricing has always been overpriced.

IF this came in a way in which consumers could vote with there dollars, ie. a model similar to the iPhone App store, then it could have a huge effect.

If Apple prices this like iTunes Music, TV & Movie rentals, or worse a one size fits all unlimited subscription model, or even worse a cable-esque packaged subsription bundle of crap to get what you want it'll tank.

First of all, it's "except it's Apple", not accept....and it's "their dollars", not there.

Apple's DRM-free music and videos are not any more expensive than the competition. Watch movies and TV shows via internet streaming is still in it's infancy. I think it's a great alternative for people that don't need 200 channels of 80% junk to watch and sort through! I will pay $30/month to watch the media I want to see. Will everyone want this option? Absolutely not, but it's the next logical step in the direction all media is heading. If Apple can convince the studios to get on board and make it somewhat affordable, then this will be a huge success. However, that's a mighty big IF!

Make it an on demand service where I can opt-in for only the specific stations I want to watch(set monthly rates per station at a reasonable price) and I am there. But it must include all of that stations content, not just some of shows. I currently pay way too much for dish services and only watch about 10 stations regularly, but I have to get a higher teir to get a couple of those stations. This could really save consumers some money, which is why I don't think the networks will ever go for it.

I would love to only have the channels I want...and I would love to never loose the remote again.

$30 to replace my $78 cable TV bill and my $15 DVR bill?

Add $10 for Netflix DVD rental, and it's a no-brainer. I'd save something like $600 a year, and gain portability and flexibility.

Considering Hulu does not work outside the US, apple has a great ecosystem ready to go it is clearly a winner.

Apples recent migration to 16:9 displays in the iMac lineup would make even more sense if this were true...

I'd buy a subscription to iTunes, if HD and a decent selection. Can pull the five major networks from an antenna, so this would supplement it and possibly drop my cable.

If ala carte, I'd like to see 1 hour shows down to 99¢ an HD rental -- a real impulse purchase.

I watch few of the several hundred cable stations I get like one of the other posters above, but the few I watch I'd hope to see in iTunes subscription package.

If the goal was to pick off the dollars that customers currently allocated towards pay-channels; namely, HBO, Showtime, Starz, etc. it might work if for no other reason than when Tablet comes out you could have a TV anywhere offering to view same content on iPhone, Tablet, Desktop and Apple TV for one price.

I do agree with others, though, that it sets up somewhat of an ALL-or-NONE as to whether same price includes Movies/TV and Music.

Some fodder on this one in my post:

Apple, TV and the Smart, Connected Living Room
http://bit.ly/k4rOf

Check it out, if interested.

Mark

The only thing that is nice about cable is i get Live news, but with the new CNN iphone app it's not so important for live TV anymore