Apple beats 'ear-bashing iPod' suit
Apple has fought off a class action lawsuit alleging iPods damage hearing.
A federal appeals court yesterday rejected the lawsuit, which claimed iPods to be defective because they lack adequate controls against “dangerous volumes” in music playback.
The lawsuit was filed by two iPod users in 2006. They argued that the max volume limit of 115dB on the products was too high - enough to cause permanent hearing loss to someone who uses the device.
The devices' ear buds provide less protection against hearing damage than conventional headphones, they claimed, observing that the volume switch doesn’t adequately inform listeners about sound levels that might be harmful.
The proposed nationwide class-action suit sought compensation for the amount that customers allegedly overpaid for the product. U.S. District Judge James Ware dismissed the case in June 2008, saying the plaintiffs offered no evidence that the iPods were defective or had harmed them, and the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco upheld his ruling Wednesday.
Meanwhile in Europe, nanny state leaders are developing laws that will require iPods and other MP3 players sold in Europe to be set at (low) maximum levels of 85 decibels. We anticipate many users will find ways to hack this.
Latest Stories on 9 to 5 Mac
- Boy Genius talks to Fortune
- Apple as religion?
- Obama demonstrates healthcare.gov on his Mac
- Mossberg reviews iPhone 4 voice calls, still better than iPhone 3GS
- Android Wallpaper app sends personal data to China
- Otterbox Cases Review: Defender for iPhone 4 and iPad, Commuter for iPad
- Meet new $139 Amazon Kindle



Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo

Comments (6)
Thankfully common sense won out here!!
If these people were so worried about damaging their hearing, perhaps they should simply turn their iPod volume down instead of trying to blame their own incompetence on someone else.
It wouldn't bother me too much if it was turned down, because I never have my music on that loud, but people should still have the right to choose the volume they want.
Why is it that we can so for anything these days?
I mean, come on.
Coffee is HOT! Volume can be soft OR LOUD. Are there so many idiots out there that we need to pad their rooms? And the saddest part yet? The court system LETS these idiots continue to do this. Other countries basically tell you what an idiot you are if you even TRY suing for ridiculous reasons. I'm so glad to see that there was an intelligent person making the decisions here. I know the decision makers in the "hot coffee case" and the "McDonald's made me fat case" were idiots.
Sorry for the rant. Stupid people anger me.
I agree with all the comments here so far; TAKE SOME F******G RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOURSELVES, YOU CRETINS!
It'd be different if they engineer iPods so that they play at a dangerous minimum volume, but they don't
They already put volume warnings in the documentation, what more can they do, have an Apple employee accompany every iPod user to make sure people don't play them too loud?
Idiots!
Arent iPod come with a software volume lock which uses a 4 digits combination lock after setting the volume...
Mayb the user or parents of younger user could actually set the combination to prevent themselves of increasing the volume to a certain dangerous lvl or the parents to control their children..
It's nice to hear a logical legal ruling from time to time!
You can't legislate the stupidity out of a moron...