ARM announces 2GHz, low power chip - is this the heart of Apple's tablet?
The old wisdom states that every journey begins with a single step, and it’s possible Apple’s tablet tale opened up yet another chapter on ARM’s morning announcement of its development of a new 2GHz, dual-core version of its Cortex-A9 architecture.
This 40-nanometre processor offers its high speed at impressively low power, which ARM pegs at 0.25-Watts per CPU. The product’s being aimed at the market for fast small home devices.
A December 2008 Computerworld article by our own Seth Weintraub predicts Apple’s tablet will be based on ARM’s Cortex architecture.
Now, we know ARM licenses its chip designs to others for manufacture. And we also know Apple’s former PA Semi engineers are expert at tweaking ARM processor designs to yield even more bang for the buck.
"This is a huge departure from what we've done in the past", Eric Schorn, vice president, marketing for ARM's processor division, told ZDNet UK. "We really wanted to take off the handcuffs and see what could be done with performance, performance, performance."
"The sweet spot for most customers is dual-core," Schorn added, "but the base design can go up to quad-core and some partners are already building those. Eight way is coming. Everyone's high-end roadmap is putting down more cores, and we do that. We're headed in the direction of Intel's mainstream processors. We have other plans that surpass the current performance, and we'll intercept Intel in a high-margin area, not just with Atom."
Now the story gets more interesting, for example, we know Apple uses a chip based on a former ARM Cortex reference design inside the iPhone 3GS. And ARM tells us it expects processors to ship to partners in the fourth quarter of 2009.
As ZDnet adds, the growing netbook and mobile market is also in the sights of the processor producer. "If you look at the high end of embedded systems, netbooks and the like, there's not much innovation relative to the mobile phone area. We want to take the rate of change of mobile phone design and innovation into other areas. Consumers will see a lot more diversity at a lot faster pace," said Schorn.
ARM’s new chip has another feature - it’s not compatible with Windows 7.
A second chip based on ARM’s design will also be made available. This consumes half a Watt of power and operates at 800MHz. The first products using these chips will appear next year, the company said.
Should Apple choose to use either design in a future or in development product, it will license the design, then adapt it, plugging in other components and applying its PA Semi expertise.
Incidentally, these processors can run things like Adobe Flash, Air, and Firefox, which older generation ARM devices can’t do.
We anticipate that in terms of power and performance, these new processors could deliver the kind of easy action Apple’s going to want to offer customers in a future mobile product, perhaps a tablet, a device that was most recently predicted to make its debut in February last year.
Latest Stories on 9 to 5 Mac
- Another SJobs@apple.com email, this time dissing Google's Picassa
- Sprint tries to get on iPhone bandwagon with 4G hotspot
- 9to5mac: What's the best value in monitors?
- Dell S2009W 20" Widescreen LCD Display for $89 + free shipping
- 10.6.3 Pre-release hits unsuspecting updater?
- Steve Jobs helps pass California organ donation bill
- Updated iTunes Connect: Submitting iPad Apps Interface


Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Comments (16)
not unless it's CISC
CISC has been and ll always remain where it has been since last 20 yrs.. it's 2009 already.. wake up!!
i think u shud hav got it from the simple statement "It's nt compatible with win 7!!.. "
Is it possible to run Snow Leopard on this chip?
If it were compiled for the architecture. I think that would be a bad experience though because you couldn't run Intel apps. An iPhone OS would be much more appropriate with an ARM processor because developers are already building their apps for that architecture.
Huh?
Watchutalkin'boutWillis?
The iPhone OS is a modified version of OS X.
My iPhone uses an ARM11 chip which runs the iPhone OS which is a vesion of OS X. So, yeah... this new 2ghz processor could run OS X.
could it fit in an iphone?
may be useful in appletv as well
How odd... I don't understand the utility of a tablet if it doesn't have the option to run Intel compiled applications. I suppose it could be designed
I was talking about snow leopard. As snow leopard run on CISC troll. We just moved over from RISC. ARM is RISC. It's not going to run the iPhone OS. Any thoughts? Anything helpful?
The Darwin kernel is compiled for both intel and ARM. ARM, as everybody should know, is the architecture used in iPhone and iPod.
The iPhone OS and the Mac OS X use this Open Source kernel.
So, the hardest part is running already in ARM. There's no much difficulty on porting the Snow Leopard System apps (The window system, Finder,iCal,Mail etc...).
It's easy then to think that seeing Snow Leopard on ARM is not far away in time, as Apple tend to migrate to processor architectures relying on performance per watt. And thats what ARM beats.
There exist some sort of x86(intel) virtualization hardware support for some RISC architectures from IBM (if I haven't misunderstood something in fast reading). Apple could design something similar to ease windows virtualization and so on, that give them a lot more mac sales.
And the rest, is just wait and see.
Nice..
The iPhone does pretty well without running any Intel apps.
Why wouldn't a tablet?
Think Different.
Sunny Guy
Why would Apple want to cannibalize their lucrative MacBook Pro lineup?
If you thought the iPhone and iPod touch were popular, wait until you see
the Apple Airbook (my name). They'll sell like hotcakes.
Sunny Guy
Atom is zippy, relatively power savvy, but still a hog when compared to A9. I can't wait until the Intel era, where the processor can literally warm up your morning coffee mug, is finally over...
I just can't wait... A computer which fits in my Camelbak and doesn't recharging for whole day? Me likey!
I've got a feeling that the name will be much more simple.....a MacBook... They've upgraded the last MB to MBPro without introducing any new MB. THey simply put this name on hold for something else and that is way fishy to me. I think they are reserving that MacBook name for the tablet. I really do.
It just makes sense. Their current drive is to show off the "Mac" name in their computers and what better name than MacBook.....? That would go in line with them completely discontinuing the plastic MacBook once and for all. Maybe, the last day we see the plastic MB is the day we see a tablet.
Books sell like hotcakes on the App Store and MacBook name would be a great fit, I think. Kindle must be shaking down to its chips marrow now...
I hope you realize, however, that the BlackBerry 9530 has a far lower radiation level than the iPhone. The curve is higher than the iPhone's, the Storm's is lower.